• Welcome
  • Israel and Judah
  • Israelite Identity
  • The Nature of Subversion
  • Translating Empire
  • War and Ethics
  • About Me

Dr. Carly L. Crouch

~ Hebrew Bible, Old Testament, Tanakh

Dr. Carly L. Crouch

Category Archives: Treaties

Tell Fekheriyeh, Deuteronomy, and the Assyrian Treaty Tradition

09 Wednesday Oct 2019

Posted by carlylcrouch in Assyriology, Deuteronomy, Prophets, Treaties

≈ Leave a comment

This book was unexpected, to say the least! It all began when I was finishing up Israel and the Assyrians, in spring 2013, and sent the manuscript to Jeremy Hutton, who was reading in Descriptive Translation Studies and in Optimality Theory. The opportunity for collaboration came with an invitation to edit a special issue of the journal Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel, for which Hutton chose the theme ‘Epigraphy, Theory, and the Hebrew Bible’, proposing that we co-author an article on the translation technique of the Tell Fekheriyeh inscription and its implications for the study of Deuteronomy.

The article, we thought, might be a bit long – 15,000 words or so. We were aiming for a deadline of December 2016. By November 2017, we had written nearly 40,000 words on just the first half of the inscription (Fekh. A) and were apologising to the editors for holding up the volume! Very kindly, the editors proposed that we produce an abbreviated version of the article for the journal, then develop a slightly longer version for Mohr Siebeck’s series Forschungen zum Alten Testament.

A year later, we were still wrestling with how to defend dealing with Fekh. B as an instance of translation, bringing in more work on bilingualism and cognitive theory – along with several video conference-style writing sessions – in the process of finding a solution. The overall result is less the “short monograph” that the editors envisioned than it is a full-size monograph, but we’re no less delighted with the results!

Deuteronomy as a Translation of Assyrian Treaties

08 Tuesday Oct 2019

Posted by carlylcrouch in Assyriology, Deuteronomy, Treaties

≈ Leave a comment

Preview, preview!

This article, co-authored with Jeremy Hutton was written for a special issue of Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel on ‘Epigraphy, Theory, and the Bible’. In it we and I analyse the way that the Tell Fekheriyeh inscription’s A text translates an Akkadian source text into Aramaic, arguing that it adopts a largely isomorphic style of translation and only occasionally uses dynamic replacement sets. We then apply these findings to the relationship between Deuteronomy and the Succession Treaty of Esarhaddon, and conclude that the relationship between these two texts looks nothing like relationship between the Akkadian and Aramaic counterparts of Tell Fekheriyeh A.

Whatever Deuteronomy’s relationship with the Succession Treaty might be, translation isn’t it.

Sound familiar? This essay builds on my work in Israel and the Assyrians. It also turned out that an article just wasn’t enough…

New review!

10 Wednesday Feb 2016

Posted by carlylcrouch in Assyriology, Deuteronomy, Reviews, Treaties

≈ Leave a comment

Out this week in the Review of Biblical Literature, Robert B. Coote’s (Senior Research Professor of Hebrew Exegesis and Old Testament at the Graduate Theological Union) review of Israel and the Assyrians:

‘Crouch’s overall argument is judicious, refreshingly disputatious, and convincing… Besides fulfilling its purpose of rebuttal, the book is useful as an excellent and up-to-date advanced introduction to the literature on ancient Near Eastern treaty and oath forms as these relate to the Bible. Its value is immense.’

Israel and the Assyrians

23 Saturday Jan 2016

Posted by carlylcrouch in Assyriology, Deuteronomy, Treaties

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Deuteronomy

Israel and the Assyrians: Deuteronomy, the Succession Treaty of Esarhaddon, and the Nature of Subversion. Ancient Near East Monographs. Atlanta, Ga.: SBL, 2014.

Israel and the Assyrians was born of musings on the curses in Deuteronomy 28—a sideline of sorts whilst I was in the midst of my work on The Making of Israel. What started as a seminar paper soon turned out to involve such a complex combination of questions that it required a full-blown monograph to address.

The book revisits the question of Deuteronomy’s relationship to the ancient Near Eastern treaty tradition. Since the discovery and publication of Assyrian treaties in the middle of the twentieth century, this relationship has been widely understood as subversive, with Deuteronomy’s author(s) pirating the Assyrian treaty form in order to undermine Assyrian imperial authority, by placing YHWH in place of the Assyrian king as the one figure to whom loyalty is due.

My suspicions were first raised when I compared Deuteronomy 28 to the Assyrian texts it was meant to be cribbing. I had the advantage of reading these texts side by side—and I still had to squint to see their supposed similarities. Did we really think that Deuteronomy’s ancient audience would have recognised them?

Rather than comparing the texts of Deuteronomy and the Assyrian treaties in the rarefied atmosphere of a scholarly office, I wanted to test the idea of Deuteronomy’s subversive intent against the social context in which that it would have actually functioned—subversion in real life, in other words. What would it take for Deuteronomy to have worked as a subversive text? To answer my question I turned to literary and contemporary film studies, whose theoretical work on adaptation and allusion provided the foundation for a discussion of subversion and its detection. I then went hunting through Deuteronomy, especially chapters 13 and 28, in search of clues that it had been written in order to subvert Assyrian imperial power. No dice.

By thinking through Deuteronomy’s relation to other ancient Near Eastern curse and treaty traditions in the historical context of its author(s) and its audience, the book undermines the popular interpretation of Deuteronomy as an anti-imperial, subversive tract—and problematises our assumptions about the Israelites’ relationship with the Assyrian Empire more generally. In the process it also challenges one of the major touchstones for the pre-exilic dating of Deuteronomy; if we want to argue that some form of Deuteronomy existed before 586 BCE, it will have to be on other grounds.

As part of the SBL’s open-access Ancient Near East Monographs series, the book is available to download for free from the SBL website. If (like me) you prefer to read your books in hard copy, it’s also available in paperback and in hardback.

Areas of Research

  • Assyriology
  • Deuteronomy
  • Ethics
  • Israel & Judah
  • Prophets
  • Reviews
  • Theology
  • Treaties
  • Uncategorized
  • Warfare

Blog at WordPress.com.

  • Follow Following
    • Dr. Carly L. Crouch
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Dr. Carly L. Crouch
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar